Once again begging the town board to preserve their sweeping vistas and quality of life, residents turned out last night to ask that proposed legislation regarding aquaculture in Southold be revisited.
The town board decided to hold off two weeks on scheduling a public hearing because of issues raised about setbacks and other issues.
At last night’s meeting, residents spoke passionately about their fears over aquaculture in town.
Some said they felt siting such operations 100 feet from a lot line, as currently proposed, was just too close to adjoining properties.
The draft legislation sites such operations in the town’s agricultural conservation, or AC zone, with 100 foot setbacks and on parcels of at least five acres. Any land based aquaculture operation should take place in a fully enclosed structure; a retail are of not more than 10 percent of the gross floor area of the structure would be allowed for direct marketing of products. In addition, the draft legislation states, any such operation must maintain all permits, licenses or other approvals required by federal, state and county authorities.
Some said the board should make sure setbacks were far enough away from residential homes near AC parcels, so they would not have to deal with smell and noise, and could enjoy the beauty of the area where they’d chosen to live.
“We can increase setbacks but if you are too draconian the state can come in,” Supervisor Scott Russell said; setting design standards has so far not posed a problem.
Peconic resident John Skabry said the taxpayers of Southold have spent in excess of $150 million to preserve farmland. “It seems to me the reason I voted for it every time it came up is to enjoy the vistas and panorama of our farms.”
He asked if lands already preserved could be used for aquaculture. Russell said any property purchased has been protected by easements.
“Do you feel pressured by the state? Is that why you are passing this law?” Skabry asked.
Russell said he’s been asking the board to table the resolution setting the hearing and to consider a larger lot size, such as 10 acres.
But, he said, Southold is an agricultural community. “This is a bonafide agricultural operation. If we are serious about agriculture we need to embrace it as an industry. We can’t just pick and choose. To ignore the new models would be foolish; we have an agricultural component to the master plan.”
Of the buildings housing aquacultural operations, Skabry said, “I think they’re ugly and they don’t belong in an agricultural area. I’m sorry to hear my town board is in favor of aquaculture. I think there’s a place for it and it’s not where we can see it.”
He added while he is pleased the town has restricted such operations to non-residential areas, there are areas where AC zones could abut residential zones, meaning a factory could be right next to someone’s house.
In January, neighbors also blasted the idea of a proposed shrimp farm in their community.
In November, Tess and Todd Gordon of Laurel came before the town board at a work session and said they hoped to launch a new, indoor, business, Celestial Shrimp Farm, in Peconic — and if approved, it would be the first indoor shrimp farm in New York State.
The couple came before the board with a live model, Bob the shrimp, to outline the specifics of their plan, which would need the board to consider expanding the allowable uses within the existing residential zone to add fish farms.
Currently, fish farming is only allowed on the town’s marine-zoned parcels; the Gordons’ hope was that the business could be sited on nine acres of property currently zoned residential on Route 48, just west of Mill Road in Peconic; that site would not be allowed under the proposed legislation.
Residents of Henry’s Lane, however, galvanized and headed to Town Hall to express their displeasure with the idea of a commercial enterprise in their residential community. Their collective fears had been fanned by a recent code committee meeting where a draft was presented that would have allowed for shrimp farming.
Margaret Skabry, John’s wife, spoke again at last night’s meeting and said she’d appreciate 1,000 foot setbacks but was glad residential area would not be considered for such uses.
“Hopefully, that’s a done deal and I don’t have to live with that threat over my head for the rest of my years,” she said.
She advocated for the 10-acre minimum, with 1000 foot setbacks. “I don’t want this near my house or anyone else’s,” she said. “Would you want to wake up to smelling and hearing creatures being ripped apart outside your house? I don’t. So protect us.”
Russell said the reason he was proposing to table the reso for two weeks was he hoped to increase acreage and setbacks, and if that happens, a new public hearing would have to be noticed.
That said, Russell added that he found it hard to grasp that those who support the “trifecta” of small business, agriculture, and buying local would not support this type of operation.
“I don’t understand how anyone can say they support those things and oppose this, or would want to put restrictions on it that would make it not viable,” he said.
